Prof. Theodore Postol: „Ich habe das Dokument des Weißen Hauses sorgfältig überprüft; es zeigt, dass die US-Regierung keinerlei konkretes Wissen hat, dass die Regierung von Syrien für den chemischen Angriff in Khan Sheikhoun verantwortlich ist. Der einzige konkrete Anhalt spricht vielmehr dafür, dass der Angriff nicht aus der Luft, sondern von Menschen vor Ort erfolgt ist.“ (Al Kaida kontrolliert diese Region) Der Kongressabgeordnete Thomas Massie, der am MIT, der Universität, an der Prof. Postol gelehrt hat, versichert: Bevor ich Schlüsse ziehe, wer in Syrien für das Giftgas verantwortlich ist, brauche ich Fakten. Ich werde alles tun, um sie finden. Die Berichte von Prof. Postol stehen im Gegensatz zu den Behauptungen der Medien. Ich hoffe, dass der Geheimdienst die Widersprüche aufklären wird, die der MIT-Professor in diesem Bericht aufgedeckt hat!

I think it’s important to collect all the facts before forming a conclusion, and I assure you I will do that. Here’s an article that challenges the current media narrative about what happened in Syria. I hope the intelligence community will present evidence to Congress to address the apparent inconsistencies highlighted in this MIT professor’s review of the publicly available facts.

Thomas Massie

Thomas Massie

Thomas Harold Massie (* 13. Januar 1971 in Huntington, West Virginia) ist ein US-amerikanischer Politiker. Seit dem 6. November 2012 vertritt er den Bundesstaat Kentucky im US-Repräsentantenhaus. Thomas Massie wuchs in Vanceburg (Kentucky) auf. Er studierte bis 1996 am Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) das Elektro- und Bauingenieurswesen. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Massie

MIT expert claims latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged

Theodore Postol of MIT says there is no concrete evidence linking Assad to the attack.

A leading weapons academic has claimed that the Khan Sheikhoun nerve agent attack in Syria was staged, raising questions about who was responsible.

Theodore Postol, a professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), issued a series of three reports in response to the White House’s finding that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad perpetrated the attack on 4 April.

Theodore Postol, a professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), issued a series of three reports in response to the White House’s finding that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad perpetrated the attack on 4 April.

He concluded that the US government’s report does not provide any „concrete“ evidence that Assad was responsible, adding it was more likely that the attack was perpetrated by players on the ground.

Postol said: „I have reviewed the [White House’s] document carefully, and I believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the document does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria at roughly 6am to 7am on 4 April, 2017.

„In fact, a main piece of evidence that is cited in the document point to an attack that was executed by individuals on the ground, not from an aircraft, on the morning of 4 April.

„This conclusion is based on an assumption made by the White House when it cited the source of the sarin release and the photographs of that source. My own assessment is that the source was very likely tampered with or staged, so no serious conclusion could be made from the photographs cited by the White House.“

The image Postol refers to is that of a crater containing a shell inside, which is said to have contained the sarin gas.

His analysis of the shell suggests that it could not have been dropped from an airplane as the damage of the casing is inconsistent from an aerial explosion. Instead, Postol said it was more likely that an explosive charge was laid upon the shell containing sarin, before being detonated.

Khan Sheikhoun crater
An image from the suspected crater of a chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria.Social media

„The explosive acted on the pipe as a blunt crushing mallet,“ Postol said. „It drove the pipe into the ground while at the same time creating the crater.

„Since the pipe was filled with sarin, which is an incompressible fluid, as the pipe was flattened, the sarin acted on the walls and ends of the pipe causing a crack along the length of the pipe and also the failure of the cap on the back end.“

The implication of Postol’s analysis is that it was carried out by anti-government insurgents as Khan Sheikhoun is in militant-controlled territory of Syria.

Postol, formerly a scientific advisor at the Department of Defense (DoD), has previously outlined similar inconsistencies with US intelligence reports. Following the 2013 chemical weapons attack in eastern Ghouta, Postol again said the evidence did not suggest Assad was responsible.

A later United Nations report did not find Assad responsible also, however it did not rule him out either – as it could not apportion blame based on the evidence. Reporting by Seymour Hersh in the London Review of Books documented that US officials whitewashed findings to blame Assad when their intelligence showed that anti-Assad militants were the most likely perpetrators.

In his latest reports, Postol hit out at what he says is a „politicisation“ of intelligence findings.

Postol said: „No competent analyst would miss the fact that the alleged sarin canister was forcefully crushed from above, rather than exploded by a munition within it.

„All of these highly amateurish mistakes indicate that this White House report, like the earlier Obama White House Report [from Ghouta in 2013], was not properly vetted by the intelligence community as claimed.

„I have worked with the intelligence community in the past, and I have grave concerns about the politicisation of intelligence that seems to be occurring with more frequency in recent times – but I know that the intelligence community has highly capable analysts in it.

„And if those analysts were properly consulted about the claims in the White House document they would have not approved the document going forward.“

Read Postol’s reports in full:

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/mit-expert-claims-latest-chemical-weapons-attack-syria-was-staged-1617267

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s