Britische Anti-Kriegs-Bewegung ruft heute auf zur Demonstration in London gegen die USA: Nein zu Trumps Angriff auf Syrien! Keine Unterstützung dafür von Großbritannien! Die Attacke wird nur zu mehr Leid führen in Syrien, die Gewalt eskalieren und zur schärferen Konfrontation mit Russland führen! Trump, der es ablehnt, syrische Flüchtlinge aufzunehmen, ist völlig unglaubwürdig, wenn er jetzt vorgibt, sich um das Leid der Syrer zu kümmern. Stop the war kritisiert die britische Regierung dafür, Trumps Angriff gut geheißen zu haben!


Emergency Protest: No to Trump’s Attack on Syria

No to Trump’s attacks on Syria
No to British support
London protest tonight, Downing Street 5-7pm


The Stop the War Coalition condemns Donald Trump’s decision to launch attacks against Syrian targets. This action will only increase the level of killing in Syria, and inflame the terrible war that has already caused untold misery for the people of the country.

This is the worst possible way to respond to the indefensible attack at Khan Sheikhun. As well as deepening the tragedy of the Syrian people, this utterly irresponsible act threatens to widen the war and lead the West into military confrontation with Russia.

It is shameful that Theresa May has rushed to support this act by the most xenophobic and reactionary US president in history.

Stop the War calls for protests today against this or any further attacks and against British support or participation. The protest in London will take place today at Downing Street from 5 to 7pm.

Trump’s senseless Syria strikes accomplish nothing

Moustafa Bayoumi: It deepens a war which the US has no idea how to end

rsz rsz missile 2

The US has launched missile attacks on Syria

Donald Trump, the man who just over a month ago wanted to bar entry of all Syrian refugees into the United States, now wants us to think that he cares deeply about Syrian children. I don’t believe it.

What I do believe is that our president is a bad actor. He was a bad actor on his old television show, and he’s still a bad actor today. And he’s a bad actor in both senses of the term, which is to say his actions are poorly executed and morally questionable.

Addressing the nation from his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, the president announced that he had authorized “a targeted military strike on the airfield in Syria from where the chemical attack was launched.” Trump was referring to a chemical weapons attack on Tuesday that killed more than 80 people, including dozens of women and children, in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun. The chemical attack had in all likelihood been carried out by the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

But what will the US’s military strike – a barrage of at least 59 (offensively named) Tomahawk cruise missiles aimed at a lone airfield – really accomplish?

Analysis Trump’s response to Syria chemical attack exposes administration’s volatility
President has touted an ‘America first’ policy, but his staff gave plenty of hints that the administration was at least considering a direct response to the atrocity

According to reports, the missiles targeted only a single Syrian airfield and not Syria’s air defenses. In other words, the attack does not ground Syria’s air force. Nor did the attack strike any of the Russian aircraft currently bombing Syria. In fact, the Russians were alerted of the attack beforehand (who may, in turn, have also alerted the Syrians). The attack does not significantly degrade the military capabilities of Bashar al-Assad.

So why attack in the first place? Once again, we’re being told by military officials that their actions are intended “to send a message.” What nonsense this is. Will Bashar al-Assad now cease his murderous actions because he’s just been delivered “a message”? How are we supposed to believe there is any strategy to Trump’s actions anyway? Just last week, Nikki Haley, Trump’s UN ambassador, said of Assad: “Do we think he’s a hindrance? Yes. Are we going to sit there and focus on getting him out? No.”

What the erratic flip-floppery of Trump’s foreign policy really means is that America’s foes can easily manipulate the Trump administration into greater and greater military quagmires.

Has the administration considered how Lebanon’s Hizbullah will react to the US bombing their close ally Bashar al-Assad? Is the Trump administration prepared to put large numbers of troops on the ground to accomplish its goals? Will it militarily challenge Russia if needed? Or does the US military now only “send messages”?

The administration seems to have no vision of what it wants to accomplish or what it can accomplish. Trump ended his announcement of Thursday’s strike with the modest goal of ending “terrorism of all kinds and all types.” Good luck with that. Meanwhile, the heart of the problem is that the United States seems always to have only one solution to war: make more war.

None of this exonerates the murderous, thuggish and brutal regime of Bashar al-Assad. The moral and strategic imperatives of our world today demand that the Syrian civil war be brought to a swift and just conclusion. And we must recognize that the end of Syria’s civil war will not be found through military means but through careful deliberation between many different parties.

But we are moving farther away from those goals. At its best, Thursday’s reckless and largely ineffective bombing does little but make US lawmakers feel good about themselves. At its worst, it deepens a war which the US has no idea how to end.

Source: The Guardian


StWC statement on the situation in Syria – 6/4/17

Statement on the situation in Syria – 6/4/17


The aerial attack on Khan Sheikhun in Idlib province, which, according to many commentators, involved chemical weapons, and which appears to have been carried out by Assad’s forces, is another terrible outrage in the war which has devastated Syria since 2011. Around 60 people were reported dead and there were hundreds of further casualties.

This attack must be condemned along with all the other atrocities of the war. Stop the War has campaigned against the war from the start and this incident only underlines the urgency of a political solution.

It is crucial that the attack is not used as a justification for further Western escalation in Syria. Foreign intervention has only served to deepen and prolong the suffering of the Syrian people. Donald Trump has already committed 1,000 US troops to Syria and intensified the bombing campaign. Further attacks can only inflame the desperate situation.

Across the border in Iraq, the Western backed assault on Iraq has led to a huge number of casualties. It is estimated that US-led coalition bombing raids have killed around 1,500 civilians in March alone and hundreds of thousands have been displaced.

It is a matter of grave concern that US foreign policy is under the control of such a volatile, confrontational and xenophobic president. All those who oppose the carnage in Syria and are concerned about the sharpening tensions around the world must raise their voices against more military intervention and demand an end to the fighting.


Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )


Verbinde mit %s