Antiwar aus den USA: Im US-Geheimdienst zweifelt man an der Regierungsgeschichte, dass Assad für den Giftgaseinsatz verantwortlich sei. Sie kritisieren, dass der Angriff auf falschen Behauptungen aufgebaut ist und zur Eskalation führen kann. Viele Geheimdienstmitarbeiter halten die Version Russlands, dass ein „normale“ Bombe eine Chemiewaffenfabrik von Al Kaida getroffen hat, für glaubwürdig. Für Assad gäbe es keinen Grund, so einen Giftgaseinsatz zu befehlen. Der US-Außenminister dagegen erklärt, dass die USA Schritte unternehmen werden, Assad zu stürzen. Trump erwägt Schritte, das mit militärischen Mitteln durchzusetzen.

Tillerson: Steps Already Underway for US Removal of Assad

Says Assad Will Have ‚No Role‘ in Syria in the Future

by Jason Ditz, April 06, 2017

Not long after officials began confirming that President Trump was “considering” military action against Syria to remove President Bashar Assad from power, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has confirmed that “steps are under way” in the administration for Assad’s ouster.

Exactly what those steps are isn’t totally clear, but Tillerson talked up the idea of an “international community effort” that would both defeat ISIS and remove Assad from power, in additional to “stabilizing” Syria as a whole. Comments from officials familiar with the situation suggest this is almost certain to be military action.

Tillerson went on to say that Assad could have no role in the future government of Syria, and that the US would take an “appropriate response” against him to ensure that this does not happen. Tillerson has insisted only a few days ago that the US was not seeking regime change.

But while seemingly every political figure in the Trump Administration is on board for this war, military and intelligence personnel are said to be increasingly concerned with the narrative line of the government, saying they have major doubts about the Assad gas attack narrative, and are concerned this will escalate into war on a false pretext.

Former CIA officer Philip Giraldi was interviewed on the matter, saying many US intelligence officials believe the Russian narrative that the Syrian airstrike was a conventional bomb that hit an al-Qaeda chemical cache. He added that the US narrative made no sense because Assad would have no motive to launch such a strike.

http://news.antiwar.com/2017/04/06/tillerson-steps-already-underway-for-us-removal-of-assad/

 

Philip Giraldi says IC-Military Doubt Assad Gas Narrative

Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter

 

Philip Giraldi, former CIA officer and Director of the Council for the National Interest, says that “military and intelligence personnel,” “intimately familiar” with the intelligence, say that the narrative that Assad or Russia did it is a “sham,” instead endorsing the Russian narrative that Assad’s forces had bombed a storage facility. Giraldi’s intelligence sources are “astonished” about the government and media narrative and are considering going public out of concern over the danger of worse war there. Giraldi also observes that the Assad regime had no motive to do such a thing at this time.

https://www.libertarianinstitute.org/scotthortonshow/4617-philip-giraldi-says-ic-military-doubt-assad-gas-narrative/

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden / Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s